https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193720 The High Court quashed all criminal proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.Nos. 111/06, 44/06, 685/06, and 861/05. The complaints failed to establish the petitioner's individual default or role in the alleged non-compliance with the Companies Act. Without specific allegations against the petitioner for default, holding him liable solely as a Director would amount to an abuse of the legal process, justifying the quashing of the proceedings. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193720 The High Court quashed all criminal proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.Nos. 111/06, 44/06, 685/06, and 861/05. The complaints failed to establish the petitioner's individual default or role in the alleged non-compliance with the Companies Act. Without specific allegations against the petitioner for default, holding him liable solely as a Director would amount to an abuse of the legal process, justifying the quashing of the proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193720