https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193721 Disputed questions about whether an accused had ceased to be a director on the date of the alleged offence, and whether liability could still attach for acts attributed to other directors, cannot be resolved in a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court held that such contested factual matters require evidence and must be determined by the trial court, because the inherent jurisdiction is not intended for adjudicating disputed facts. Relief was therefore refused, leaving the factual controversy to be tried in the criminal proceedings. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:40:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193721 Disputed questions about whether an accused had ceased to be a director on the date of the alleged offence, and whether liability could still attach for acts attributed to other directors, cannot be resolved in a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court held that such contested factual matters require evidence and must be determined by the trial court, because the inherent jurisdiction is not intended for adjudicating disputed facts. Relief was therefore refused, leaving the factual controversy to be tried in the criminal proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193721