<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1343 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193723</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law concerning whether section 194LA applied and how the land should be characterised for tax deduction purposes. Notice was not issued because the respondent was already represented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:40:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1343 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193723</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law concerning whether section 194LA applied and how the land should be characterised for tax deduction purposes. Notice was not issued because the respondent was already represented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>