https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9535 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the direction for a special audit under section 142(2A) based on the petitioner's contradictory conduct of initially accepting the audit and later challenging it. The court found that by accepting the audit direction and requesting an extension, the petitioner had waived its right to relief through extraordinary jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the petition without delving into the substantive arguments raised by both parties regarding the necessity and justification for the special audit. en-us Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9535 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the direction for a special audit under section 142(2A) based on the petitioner's contradictory conduct of initially accepting the audit and later challenging it. The court found that by accepting the audit direction and requesting an extension, the petitioner had waived its right to relief through extraordinary jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the petition without delving into the substantive arguments raised by both parties regarding the necessity and justification for the special audit. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9535