<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9532</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues raised, allowing deductions for telex rent, telephone rent, postal franking machine rent, rates, taxes, and prepaid expenditure as they were expenses actually incurred for the business. The court also held that the addition under section 41(1) did not apply as there was no benefit obtained by the assessee. Additionally, the deduction for payment made for the purchase of new computers was allowed as the expenditure was for upgrading existing computers and did not result in an enduring benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9532</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues raised, allowing deductions for telex rent, telephone rent, postal franking machine rent, rates, taxes, and prepaid expenditure as they were expenses actually incurred for the business. The court also held that the addition under section 41(1) did not apply as there was no benefit obtained by the assessee. Additionally, the deduction for payment made for the purchase of new computers was allowed as the expenditure was for upgrading existing computers and did not result in an enduring benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>