https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193703 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case involving limitation, fraud, remand order, proof of debit items, and deduction of specific debit items. The court held that the suit was not barred by limitation as it was to enforce a continuing guarantee bond. It found no evidence of fraud in obtaining a debt acknowledgment letter. The remand order was deemed justified, allowing examination of debit items. Specific debit items were verified, and the court decreed the plaintiff entitled to Rs. 69,105-7-8 with interest. The appeal was partially allowed, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193703 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case involving limitation, fraud, remand order, proof of debit items, and deduction of specific debit items. The court held that the suit was not barred by limitation as it was to enforce a continuing guarantee bond. It found no evidence of fraud in obtaining a debt acknowledgment letter. The remand order was deemed justified, allowing examination of debit items. Specific debit items were verified, and the court decreed the plaintiff entitled to Rs. 69,105-7-8 with interest. The appeal was partially allowed, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193703