<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 674 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193702</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the appellant against the disallowance claim under section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80IB was rejected as it was found that the appellant&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria of &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; as required by the law. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) upholding the disallowance claim was affirmed by the Tribunal, based on previous decisions in the appellant&#039;s own case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 674 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193702</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the appellant against the disallowance claim under section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80IB was rejected as it was found that the appellant&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria of &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; as required by the law. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) upholding the disallowance claim was affirmed by the Tribunal, based on previous decisions in the appellant&#039;s own case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>