https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9529 The Court rejected the petitioner's argument against modifying the settlement order under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, citing the Supreme Court's allowance for rectification of mistakes. The Court upheld the demand for interest under section 220(2) for the years 1990-91 and 1991-92. For the year 1993-94, the Court directed verification of records to determine the actual liability under the scheme, instructing the revision of the demand notice within six weeks. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9529 The Court rejected the petitioner's argument against modifying the settlement order under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, citing the Supreme Court's allowance for rectification of mistakes. The Court upheld the demand for interest under section 220(2) for the years 1990-91 and 1991-92. For the year 1993-94, the Court directed verification of records to determine the actual liability under the scheme, instructing the revision of the demand notice within six weeks. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9529