<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 528 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 22.05 crores based on entries in a seized document, citing lack of corroborative evidence. The Tribunal reduced the addition of Rs. 11 lakhs to Rs. 2.67 lakhs, considering personal and business cash balances presented by the assessee. The decision provided a balanced resolution, emphasizing the need for clear evidence to support income additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 528 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 22.05 crores based on entries in a seized document, citing lack of corroborative evidence. The Tribunal reduced the addition of Rs. 11 lakhs to Rs. 2.67 lakhs, considering personal and business cash balances presented by the assessee. The decision provided a balanced resolution, emphasizing the need for clear evidence to support income additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>