<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by validating the revised return filed by the assessee and ruling that Section 115JB does not apply to the general insurance company. Consequently, issues regarding the set-off of unabsorbed loss, addition of expenditure related to exempt income, and disallowance under Section 14A were rendered moot. The reassessment proceedings issue became irrelevant due to the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on other grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by validating the revised return filed by the assessee and ruling that Section 115JB does not apply to the general insurance company. Consequently, issues regarding the set-off of unabsorbed loss, addition of expenditure related to exempt income, and disallowance under Section 14A were rendered moot. The reassessment proceedings issue became irrelevant due to the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on other grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>