<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 515 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on the violation of Rule 11(2) of CCR, 2004. The decision was grounded on the inadmissibility of credit availment in the subsequent year due to lapsing provisions linked to opting for SSI exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 515 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on the violation of Rule 11(2) of CCR, 2004. The decision was grounded on the inadmissibility of credit availment in the subsequent year due to lapsing provisions linked to opting for SSI exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>