<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 776 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193692</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Government Orders as arbitrary and discriminatory, violating Articles 14 and 16. It held that the cap on promotions for Private Secretaries was unreasonable and against the constitutional scheme of equality. The decision emphasized the importance of rules being fair and aligned with constitutional principles, ensuring equal promotional opportunities. The appeals were allowed with costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 776 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193692</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Government Orders as arbitrary and discriminatory, violating Articles 14 and 16. It held that the cap on promotions for Private Secretaries was unreasonable and against the constitutional scheme of equality. The decision emphasized the importance of rules being fair and aligned with constitutional principles, ensuring equal promotional opportunities. The appeals were allowed with costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>