<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 506 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346448</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court permitted an appellant to purge contempt by tendering specified demand drafts, and by making both written and oral apologies before the High Court. It also deferred the arrest ordered by the High Court for one month to facilitate compliance. Upon such compliance, the High Court was left free to pass appropriate orders, and the Supreme Court expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 07:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 506 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346448</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court permitted an appellant to purge contempt by tendering specified demand drafts, and by making both written and oral apologies before the High Court. It also deferred the arrest ordered by the High Court for one month to facilitate compliance. Upon such compliance, the High Court was left free to pass appropriate orders, and the Supreme Court expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>