https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346446 The court upheld the validity of the notification dated 7.4.2006 regulating the import of boric acid for non-insecticidal purposes. It found that the Ministry of Agriculture had the authority to regulate imports under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and dismissed allegations of mala fide intent. The court deemed the notification reasonable due to the toxic nature of boric acid and emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in policy decisions. Subordinate legislation was upheld, and the petition was ultimately dismissed. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346446 The court upheld the validity of the notification dated 7.4.2006 regulating the import of boric acid for non-insecticidal purposes. It found that the Ministry of Agriculture had the authority to regulate imports under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and dismissed allegations of mala fide intent. The court deemed the notification reasonable due to the toxic nature of boric acid and emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in policy decisions. Subordinate legislation was upheld, and the petition was ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346446