<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 498 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346440</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay quashed previous orders and directed a re-hearing by a different bench. The tribunal dismissed jurisdictional challenges as infructuous and found the evidence for undervaluation of imported goods unreliable. Consequently, all charges, including confiscation, were lifted, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, underscoring the necessity for authenticated evidence in undervaluation claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 498 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346440</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay quashed previous orders and directed a re-hearing by a different bench. The tribunal dismissed jurisdictional challenges as infructuous and found the evidence for undervaluation of imported goods unreliable. Consequently, all charges, including confiscation, were lifted, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, underscoring the necessity for authenticated evidence in undervaluation claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>