https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346438 The Tribunal held that the imported goods, classified as hazardous waste by the authorities, were not liable for confiscation as the plastic material was not proven to be hazardous waste. Expert reports confirmed the material was recyclable and did not contain hazardous heavy metals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for expert opinions and evidence in such cases and overturned the decision for confiscation and re-export, ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346438 The Tribunal held that the imported goods, classified as hazardous waste by the authorities, were not liable for confiscation as the plastic material was not proven to be hazardous waste. Expert reports confirmed the material was recyclable and did not contain hazardous heavy metals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for expert opinions and evidence in such cases and overturned the decision for confiscation and re-export, ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346438