<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 491 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346433</link>
    <description>The court admitted the application under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The moratorium under Section 14 was triggered, applying only to properties owned by the corporate debtor. Mr. Rajendra Karanmal Bhuta was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, responsible for managing the debtor&#039;s affairs and submitting progress reports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 491 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346433</link>
      <description>The court admitted the application under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The moratorium under Section 14 was triggered, applying only to properties owned by the corporate debtor. Mr. Rajendra Karanmal Bhuta was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, responsible for managing the debtor&#039;s affairs and submitting progress reports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>