<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9520</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a cinema building, like Sree Talkies, does not qualify as a &quot;house&quot; under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act. Therefore, a partner in a partnership firm owning such a property is not entitled to exemption under the Act. The court&#039;s decision aligned with precedent, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9520</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a cinema building, like Sree Talkies, does not qualify as a &quot;house&quot; under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act. Therefore, a partner in a partnership firm owning such a property is not entitled to exemption under the Act. The court&#039;s decision aligned with precedent, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>