https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193685 A tenant's interest in non-residential premises under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 is treated as property capable of transfer and, therefore, attachment in execution. A lease creates an interest in immovable property, and the lessee's right to remain in occupation is a proprietary interest. Restrictions on sub-letting, assignment or transfer under the Act are not absolute, and breach of those restrictions does not prevent a court sale in execution. Section 60 of the CPC excludes only a lessee's interest in a residential building, not non-residential premises. The position is that limits on voluntary alienation do not bar transfer by operation of law. en-us Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:17:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193685 A tenant's interest in non-residential premises under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 is treated as property capable of transfer and, therefore, attachment in execution. A lease creates an interest in immovable property, and the lessee's right to remain in occupation is a proprietary interest. Restrictions on sub-letting, assignment or transfer under the Act are not absolute, and breach of those restrictions does not prevent a court sale in execution. Section 60 of the CPC excludes only a lessee's interest in a residential building, not non-residential premises. The position is that limits on voluntary alienation do not bar transfer by operation of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193685