https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346414 The Court dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1280 days in re-filing, rejecting the petitioner's reasons related to the complexities of e-filing for taxation appeals and the department's alleged lack of monitoring. Despite the challenges highlighted by the petitioner, including the need for specialized software and correspondence for expenses, the Court found the explanations insufficient to justify the lengthy delay. The Court emphasized the importance of timely compliance and oversight, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:28:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346414 The Court dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1280 days in re-filing, rejecting the petitioner's reasons related to the complexities of e-filing for taxation appeals and the department's alleged lack of monitoring. Despite the challenges highlighted by the petitioner, including the need for specialized software and correspondence for expenses, the Court found the explanations insufficient to justify the lengthy delay. The Court emphasized the importance of timely compliance and oversight, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346414