<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, citing time limitations. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments of exemption under Notification No.8/2005 and unjust enrichment, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits for refund claims, supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal due to the refund claim exceeding the prescribed time limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:28:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, citing time limitations. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments of exemption under Notification No.8/2005 and unjust enrichment, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits for refund claims, supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal due to the refund claim exceeding the prescribed time limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>