<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 462 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim by Commissioner (A) and allowed the appeal of the appellant, emphasizing the need for a conclusive decision by the High Court before further proceedings. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s decision premature due to pending appeals before the High Court, rendering the impugned order unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 462 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim by Commissioner (A) and allowed the appeal of the appellant, emphasizing the need for a conclusive decision by the High Court before further proceedings. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s decision premature due to pending appeals before the High Court, rendering the impugned order unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>