https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346395 The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. Emphasizing limited revisional jurisdiction, the court affirmed the presumption of liability under relevant sections of the Act. It found the debt legally enforceable, rejecting claims of non-joinder of parties. The court upheld lower courts' findings on evidence appreciation, dismissing the revision petition and maintaining the conviction and sentence, including imprisonment and compensation to the complainant. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:27:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346395 The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. Emphasizing limited revisional jurisdiction, the court affirmed the presumption of liability under relevant sections of the Act. It found the debt legally enforceable, rejecting claims of non-joinder of parties. The court upheld lower courts' findings on evidence appreciation, dismissing the revision petition and maintaining the conviction and sentence, including imprisonment and compensation to the complainant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346395