<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1238 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals in the case. The first ground was dismissed as it awaited the High Court decision. The second ground was partly allowed, directing exclusion of strategic investments from disallowance calculation. The third ground was allowed, instructing verification and application of the High Court decision. The fourth ground was dismissed due to lack of argument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1238 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals in the case. The first ground was dismissed as it awaited the High Court decision. The second ground was partly allowed, directing exclusion of strategic investments from disallowance calculation. The third ground was allowed, instructing verification and application of the High Court decision. The fourth ground was dismissed due to lack of argument.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>