https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193683 Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers a judicial discretion to direct a subsequent sentence to run concurrently with an earlier sentence, rather than applying the normal rule of consecutive operation. Applying that discretion to offences committed on the same day and considering the limited duration of the substantive imprisonment, the Court treated concurrency as appropriate for the substantive terms in the four later cases. The fine sentences and default sentences were left untouched and were not ordered to run concurrently, preserving their separate operation. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:27:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193683 Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers a judicial discretion to direct a subsequent sentence to run concurrently with an earlier sentence, rather than applying the normal rule of consecutive operation. Applying that discretion to offences committed on the same day and considering the limited duration of the substantive imprisonment, the Court treated concurrency as appropriate for the substantive terms in the four later cases. The fine sentences and default sentences were left untouched and were not ordered to run concurrently, preserving their separate operation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193683