https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193675 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding the authority to sign and verify the plaint. However, the court decided in favor of the defendants on issues related to agency status, the effect of the export ban on contracts, extensions, cancellation charges, and the limitation period for filing the suit. The court held that the banning order led to the automatic dissolution of the contracts due to frustration, relieving the parties from their obligations. As a result, the suit was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:02:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193675 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding the authority to sign and verify the plaint. However, the court decided in favor of the defendants on issues related to agency status, the effect of the export ban on contracts, extensions, cancellation charges, and the limitation period for filing the suit. The court held that the banning order led to the automatic dissolution of the contracts due to frustration, relieving the parties from their obligations. As a result, the suit was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193675