https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674 The court quashed the orders canceling the quarry lease, citing unauthorized transfer and failure to maintain proper accounts as invalid grounds. It ruled that the agreements for extraction and sale of limestone did not constitute a transfer of the lease. The rejection of the application for transfer lacked justification and clarity. The State Government was directed to reconsider the transfer application, award costs to the petitioner, and refund the security deposit. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:51:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674 The court quashed the orders canceling the quarry lease, citing unauthorized transfer and failure to maintain proper accounts as invalid grounds. It ruled that the agreements for extraction and sale of limestone did not constitute a transfer of the lease. The rejection of the application for transfer lacked justification and clarity. The State Government was directed to reconsider the transfer application, award costs to the petitioner, and refund the security deposit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674