https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674 A quarry lease could not be cancelled for alleged unauthorised transfer where the lessee's agreements did not divest his leasehold rights and therefore did not amount to assignment, transfer or subletting. Cancellation for improper accounts also failed because the governing rules required a written notice and 30 days to remedy the default before determination of the lease and forfeiture of security, and no such notice was given. Refusal of sanction for transfer was likewise unsustainable because it rested on the mistaken assumption that the agreements themselves were a prohibited transfer. Both impugned orders were quashed and the transfer request had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:51:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674 A quarry lease could not be cancelled for alleged unauthorised transfer where the lessee's agreements did not divest his leasehold rights and therefore did not amount to assignment, transfer or subletting. Cancellation for improper accounts also failed because the governing rules required a written notice and 30 days to remedy the default before determination of the lease and forfeiture of security, and no such notice was given. Refusal of sanction for transfer was likewise unsustainable because it rested on the mistaken assumption that the agreements themselves were a prohibited transfer. Both impugned orders were quashed and the transfer request had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193674