<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 435 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193670</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that the Company Law Board (CLB) can compound offences under Section 621A(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, without prior permission from the criminal court, even if prosecution is pending. The CLB&#039;s compounding jurisdiction is separate from the court&#039;s jurisdiction under Sub-section (7) of Section 621A. The case was remanded to the Northern Region Bench for further consideration of the compounding application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 435 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193670</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that the Company Law Board (CLB) can compound offences under Section 621A(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, without prior permission from the criminal court, even if prosecution is pending. The CLB&#039;s compounding jurisdiction is separate from the court&#039;s jurisdiction under Sub-section (7) of Section 621A. The case was remanded to the Northern Region Bench for further consideration of the compounding application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>