<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193666</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Ombudsman&#039;s award and remitted the complaint for fresh disposal in light of RBI circulars on charging interest from landlords whose buildings are leased by banks. The Ombudsman must consider these circulars and allow the parties to present their views. The appeal was allowed, and the complaint was remanded to the Banking Ombudsman, Hyderabad, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193666</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Ombudsman&#039;s award and remitted the complaint for fresh disposal in light of RBI circulars on charging interest from landlords whose buildings are leased by banks. The Ombudsman must consider these circulars and allow the parties to present their views. The appeal was allowed, and the complaint was remanded to the Banking Ombudsman, Hyderabad, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>