<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193664</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case to determine if the ITAT&#039;s restriction on unexplained deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank accounts was correct. The addition was limited to Rs. 5,87,374 instead of Rs. 72,08,996 based on the peak credit theory. The respondent agreed to file the necessary documents within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193664</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case to determine if the ITAT&#039;s restriction on unexplained deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank accounts was correct. The addition was limited to Rs. 5,87,374 instead of Rs. 72,08,996 based on the peak credit theory. The respondent agreed to file the necessary documents within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>