<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193659</link>
    <description>Soya sludge, also described as soya gum, was held not excisable on the basis of an earlier Tribunal ruling covering the same product. As the product did not fall within Chapter sub-heading 15.22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the attempted classification failed and the central excise duty confirmation could not survive. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee, and the duty demand was unsustainable because a non-excisable product cannot be subjected to excise duty under the claimed tariff heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193659</link>
      <description>Soya sludge, also described as soya gum, was held not excisable on the basis of an earlier Tribunal ruling covering the same product. As the product did not fall within Chapter sub-heading 15.22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the attempted classification failed and the central excise duty confirmation could not survive. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee, and the duty demand was unsustainable because a non-excisable product cannot be subjected to excise duty under the claimed tariff heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>