<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 438 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346380</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd., affirming the classification of services provided as management, maintenance, and repair service rather than commercial and industrial construction service. The Tribunal found that the nature of work in the contract primarily involved maintenance activities, leading to the conclusion that the services aligned more with maintenance and repair service. The appellant&#039;s argument that their services should be classified as construction service was rejected, and the Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax. The judgment was pronounced on 27.7.2017 by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 438 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346380</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd., affirming the classification of services provided as management, maintenance, and repair service rather than commercial and industrial construction service. The Tribunal found that the nature of work in the contract primarily involved maintenance activities, leading to the conclusion that the services aligned more with maintenance and repair service. The appellant&#039;s argument that their services should be classified as construction service was rejected, and the Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax. The judgment was pronounced on 27.7.2017 by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>