<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 433 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346375</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order by the Settlement Commission that allowed the adjustment of Rs. 16,99,981 towards antidumping duty, which was found to be time-barred under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The court directed the Respondents to reconsider the issue within three months, invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 433 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346375</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order by the Settlement Commission that allowed the adjustment of Rs. 16,99,981 towards antidumping duty, which was found to be time-barred under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The court directed the Respondents to reconsider the issue within three months, invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>