https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346369 A writ petition challenging an assessment order was considered non-maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Haryana VAT Act, 2003. The dispute involved factual issues regarding service of notice and the correctness of an ex parte assessment, which were better suited to the appellate forum. Applying the settled rule of self-imposed restraint in writ jurisdiction, and finding no exceptional ground for immediate interference, the writ remedy was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346369 A writ petition challenging an assessment order was considered non-maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Haryana VAT Act, 2003. The dispute involved factual issues regarding service of notice and the correctness of an ex parte assessment, which were better suited to the appellate forum. Applying the settled rule of self-imposed restraint in writ jurisdiction, and finding no exceptional ground for immediate interference, the writ remedy was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346369