<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9500</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized the necessity of proving the inability to recover from the company before holding directors jointly and severally liable. The respondent failed to establish this prerequisite, leading to the court setting aside the order and prohibiting further proceedings based on it. The interpretation of the phrase &quot;jointly and severally&quot; in the context of directors&#039; liability was left open. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was successful, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9500</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized the necessity of proving the inability to recover from the company before holding directors jointly and severally liable. The respondent failed to establish this prerequisite, leading to the court setting aside the order and prohibiting further proceedings based on it. The interpretation of the phrase &quot;jointly and severally&quot; in the context of directors&#039; liability was left open. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was successful, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>