<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193644</link>
    <description>A similar question of law had already been rejected in an earlier Bombay High Court decision, and the present income-tax appeal was dismissed for the same reasons. The order records that counsel for both sides accepted the prior ruling as governing the issue, so the court followed that earlier decision and disposed of the matter without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193644</link>
      <description>A similar question of law had already been rejected in an earlier Bombay High Court decision, and the present income-tax appeal was dismissed for the same reasons. The order records that counsel for both sides accepted the prior ruling as governing the issue, so the court followed that earlier decision and disposed of the matter without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>