<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Denied Service Tax Refund Due to Non-Protest Payment; Misses Section 11B(1) Exemption on Limitation Period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35882</link>
    <description>Refund - Since the payment of service tax during the said period was not under protest, the Appellant was unable to take advantage of the second proviso under Section 11B (1) of the CE Act which states that the limitation of one year will not apply where any duty and interest has been paid under protest. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:32:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:32:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Denied Service Tax Refund Due to Non-Protest Payment; Misses Section 11B(1) Exemption on Limitation Period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35882</link>
      <description>Refund - Since the payment of service tax during the said period was not under protest, the Appellant was unable to take advantage of the second proviso under Section 11B (1) of the CE Act which states that the limitation of one year will not apply where any duty and interest has been paid under protest. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:32:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>