<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1055 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193641</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC held that octroi collected by an agent appointed by the assessee falls within the ambit of Section 206C(1C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and is liable for tax collection at source. The court distinguished octroi from toll and emphasized that the collection of octroi triggers the tax collection obligation under the said provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1055 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193641</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC held that octroi collected by an agent appointed by the assessee falls within the ambit of Section 206C(1C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and is liable for tax collection at source. The court distinguished octroi from toll and emphasized that the collection of octroi triggers the tax collection obligation under the said provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>