<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 40 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9491</link>
    <description>The court concluded that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act does not apply to income-tax proceedings under Section 146 of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the penalty under Section 273(c) was deemed unjustified. The matter was remanded for reconsideration on other grounds, with the questions of law answered in the negative, favoring the Revenue against the assessee. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 40 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9491</link>
      <description>The court concluded that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act does not apply to income-tax proceedings under Section 146 of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the penalty under Section 273(c) was deemed unjustified. The matter was remanded for reconsideration on other grounds, with the questions of law answered in the negative, favoring the Revenue against the assessee. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>