<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 399 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, waiving penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax. The confusion surrounding tax liability issues and the appellant&#039;s cooperation in paying the service tax demand before the show cause notice was issued were considered. However, the Tribunal did not interfere with the service tax demand, interest, and penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 399 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, waiving penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax. The confusion surrounding tax liability issues and the appellant&#039;s cooperation in paying the service tax demand before the show cause notice was issued were considered. However, the Tribunal did not interfere with the service tax demand, interest, and penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>