https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346339 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was determined that the restrictions in Rule 6 did not apply to the appellant's situation regarding the reversal of the amount equal to the sale price of exempted goods, specifically by-products like Acid Oil, Soya Lecithin, and Oil Sludge. The Tribunal found that the demands made by the Department were not sustainable for the periods in question (March 2003 to March 2004 and April 2004 to February 2005) and set them aside, citing compliance with payment requirements despite procedural errors. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 18:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346339 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was determined that the restrictions in Rule 6 did not apply to the appellant's situation regarding the reversal of the amount equal to the sale price of exempted goods, specifically by-products like Acid Oil, Soya Lecithin, and Oil Sludge. The Tribunal found that the demands made by the Department were not sustainable for the periods in question (March 2003 to March 2004 and April 2004 to February 2005) and set them aside, citing compliance with payment requirements despite procedural errors. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346339