<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the insolvency petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the Corporate Debtor for an outstanding debt claim of USD 445,416. Despite objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding consignment quality and interest rates, the Tribunal deemed them unsustainable and lacking merit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for genuine disputes and admitted the petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process for 180 days. A moratorium was declared, and an Interim Insolvency Professional was recommended to oversee the resolution process, ensuring protection of essential goods or services supply to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the insolvency petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the Corporate Debtor for an outstanding debt claim of USD 445,416. Despite objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding consignment quality and interest rates, the Tribunal deemed them unsustainable and lacking merit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for genuine disputes and admitted the petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process for 180 days. A moratorium was declared, and an Interim Insolvency Professional was recommended to oversee the resolution process, ensuring protection of essential goods or services supply to the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>