<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 388 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346330</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the CBI, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision to quash charges against the respondent. Insufficient evidence was presented to implicate the respondent in the alleged conspiracy and demand for illegal gratification. Intercepted calls and witness statements did not establish a prima facie case against the respondent. The trial court was directed to proceed with the case against other accused individuals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 388 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346330</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the CBI, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision to quash charges against the respondent. Insufficient evidence was presented to implicate the respondent in the alleged conspiracy and demand for illegal gratification. Intercepted calls and witness statements did not establish a prima facie case against the respondent. The trial court was directed to proceed with the case against other accused individuals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>