<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1242 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly by directing the exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustments, accepting the treatment of foreign currency expenditure as per the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling, and remitting the issue of software expenditure back to the AO for fresh consideration. The appeal was allowed pro tanto.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1242 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly by directing the exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustments, accepting the treatment of foreign currency expenditure as per the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling, and remitting the issue of software expenditure back to the AO for fresh consideration. The appeal was allowed pro tanto.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>