<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1808 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193631</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under the 1987 Act is limited to claims for refund of freight and does not extend to claims for refund of wharfage and demurrage charges. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the claim petition due to lack of jurisdiction over the specific charges in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1808 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193631</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under the 1987 Act is limited to claims for refund of freight and does not extend to claims for refund of wharfage and demurrage charges. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the claim petition due to lack of jurisdiction over the specific charges in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>