<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1228 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193635</link>
    <description>The court set aside the CLB&#039;s order dismissing the Company Petition and remanded the matter to the NCLT for fresh consideration. The NCLT was directed to examine the original minutes of the Board meetings and other statutory records to determine the appellant&#039;s locus standi and the validity of the share transfer. The court allowed both parties to produce additional documents to support their claims. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1228 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193635</link>
      <description>The court set aside the CLB&#039;s order dismissing the Company Petition and remanded the matter to the NCLT for fresh consideration. The NCLT was directed to examine the original minutes of the Board meetings and other statutory records to determine the appellant&#039;s locus standi and the validity of the share transfer. The court allowed both parties to produce additional documents to support their claims. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>