<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193625</link>
    <description>A petition seeking to restrain CESTAT from hearing specified appeals was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn. The High Court made no order as to costs and expressly recorded that all contentions of both parties remained open for adjudication. The court therefore did not decide the merits of the dispute and preserved the parties&#039; ability to pursue their respective arguments before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 18:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193625</link>
      <description>A petition seeking to restrain CESTAT from hearing specified appeals was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn. The High Court made no order as to costs and expressly recorded that all contentions of both parties remained open for adjudication. The court therefore did not decide the merits of the dispute and preserved the parties&#039; ability to pursue their respective arguments before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>