<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9479</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). It emphasized the importance of proper verification in tax assessments and the burden of proof on the Assessing Officer. The court found no grounds to interfere with the concurrent factual findings, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence to challenge lower authorities&#039; conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9479</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). It emphasized the importance of proper verification in tax assessments and the burden of proof on the Assessing Officer. The court found no grounds to interfere with the concurrent factual findings, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence to challenge lower authorities&#039; conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>