https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193612 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment in the Second Appeal due to the High Court's failure to adhere to the procedural requirement of formulating substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC. The case was remanded back to the High Court for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting evidence in property cases involving inheritance rights. The directive for expeditious disposal within six months was issued, with no order as to costs given the circumstances of the case. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 12:19:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193612 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment in the Second Appeal due to the High Court's failure to adhere to the procedural requirement of formulating substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC. The case was remanded back to the High Court for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting evidence in property cases involving inheritance rights. The directive for expeditious disposal within six months was issued, with no order as to costs given the circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193612