<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1103 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193610</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the need for alignment between the entity&#039;s objectives and the statutory requirements for claiming tax exemptions, ruling that the appellant&#039;s activities did not fall within the scope of the exemption provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1103 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193610</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the need for alignment between the entity&#039;s objectives and the statutory requirements for claiming tax exemptions, ruling that the appellant&#039;s activities did not fall within the scope of the exemption provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>